Ivanooo

Certification

WBS CODING SCHOOL

Durartion of the Course

17 weeks

Course Fee

$11.01

Mode of Learning

Instructor-led lectures (virtual or in-person)

What is The Course All About?

Pros:

Comprehensive full-stack web development curriculum.
Live online instruction with experienced instructors.
Hands-on projects and collaborative learning.
Strong emphasis on community building.
Part-time option for flexibility.
Cons:

Lacks a dedicated mentorship program.
Limited details on career services and industry partnerships.
Specifics about the capstone project are not readily available.

Primary Focus: Skill Acquisition

Who is the Course Meant For?

Individuals seeking a career change into web and app development.
Aspiring developers with little to no prior coding experience
Professionals looking to enhance their tech skills and transition into the tech industry
Those interested in a comprehensive, full-time, or part-time bootcamp experience.

Accreditations and Rankings

WBS CODING SCHOOL
Foundational (for beginners)

Skills: What does this program cover?

Depth and Breadth of Topics

  • Range of topics covered. - Number of topics, comprehensiveness (introductory to advanced)
  • Theoretical vs. practical balance
  • Alignment with industry standards and current trends
Grade
90%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Case Studies/Real World Events

  • Number and variety of case studies
  • Relevance of case studies to the course topic and target audience
Grade
67%Moderate

No specific reasons provided.

Tools

  • Use of industrystandard tools and technologies
  • Handson experience with tools
Grade
100%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Hands-on Projects and Applications

  • Presence of a project or practical application
  • Complexity and scope of the project
Grade
160%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Faculties: Who are the experts behind the course?

Academic/Industry Exp.

  • Educational background
  • Work experience in relevant industries
Grade
86%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Faculty Involvement

  • Evaluates the active role and contribution of all individuals—faculty, teaching assistants, mentors, and support staff—who directly support, guide, or enhance the learning experience throughout the course.
Grade
83%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Industry Recognition

  • Awards and recognition in the field
  • Contributions to opensource projects, communities, or publications
Grade
100%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Delivery Methods: How Is the program delivered?

Active Interaction

  • Availability of live lectures, Q&A sessions, or webinars
  • Provide direct interaction and realtime clarification of concepts
  • Quality and effectiveness of live interactions
Grade
100%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Self-paced/Flexible Resources

  • Flexibility in scheduling and pacing
  • Prerecorded videos covering lectures, tutorials, demonstrations, and supplemental content, allowing students to engage with course material flexibly.
  • Quality and availability of selfpaced materials (videos, readings, exercises)
Grade
17%Very Limited

No specific reasons provided.

Assessment

  • Variety of assessment types (quizzes, assignments, projects)
  • Alignment of assessments with learning objectives
  • Quality and timeliness of feedback on assessments
Grade
83%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Community

  • Presence and activity of online forums, discussion boards, or other community spaces
  • Level of engagement and support from instructors and moderators
Grade
83%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Collaborative

  • Opportunities for group projects, peer review, or other collaborative activities
Grade
100%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Career Assistance: How does the program support career growth?

Mentoring

  • Availability of personalized guidance and support from mentors or career coaches
Grade
60%Moderate

No specific reasons provided.

Personalized Assistance

  • Availability of career Assessments (personality, skills, interests) to help learners understand their strengths and potential career paths
Grade
80%Strong

No specific reasons provided.

Alumni Network

  • Active alumni network for networking
Grade
67%Moderate

No specific reasons provided.

Industry Partnerships

  • Partnerships with companies
Grade
50%Moderate

No specific reasons provided.

Deep-Dive/Skin in the Game

  • Aligns with how humans build skills—through real-world action, not passive theory
  • Encourages simultaneous learning and doing, with no delay between concept and practice
  • Prioritizes real-time feedback in immersive, high-engagement settings.
  • Measures how much learners are made to commit, apply, and perform—putting real skin in the game.
Grade
40%Limited

No specific reasons provided.

Benchmark Labels:

Strong (75-100%): This indicates the course demonstrates exceptional strengths in this area, exceeding expectations.
Moderate (50-74%): This signifies the course performs adequately in this area, covering essential aspects.
Limited (25-49%): This highlights areas where the course could significantly improve to provide a more comprehensive learning experience.
Very Limited (0-24%): This indicates that coverage in this area may be minimal, or even non-existent.

No Reviews found!