University of Maryland PMP® Exam Prep -Ivanooo

Accrediations

University of Maryland, edX

Durartion of the Course

4 months

Course Fee

$428.35

Mode of Learning

Self-Paced with Assessments

What is The Course All About?

Pros

Flexible, self-paced learning structure suited to working professionals.
Strong academic foundation with University of Maryland backing.
Well-organized content focused on PMP® exam preparation.

Cons

Limited real-world application and absence of a capstone project.
Minimal live interaction and collaborative learning opportunities.
Lack of structured career support and alumni engagement.

Primary Focus: PMP® Exam Preparation and Skill Acquisition

Who is the Course Meant For?

This course is tailored for professionals preparing for the PMP® exam and looking to solidify their project management skills, especially those seeking structured learning in PMP methodologies, terminology, and techniques.

Accreditations and Rankings

University of Maryland, edX

Foundational (for beginners)

Skills: What does this program cover?

Depth and Breadth of Topics
ⓘ
- Range of topics covered. - Number of topics, comprehensiveness (introductory to advanced)
- Theoretical vs. practical balance
- Alignment with industry standards and current trends
Moderate
Case Studies
ⓘ
- Number and variety of case studies
- Relevance of case studies to the course topic and target audience
Moderate
Tools
ⓘ
- Use of industrystandard tools and technologies
- Handson experience with tools
Strong
Capstone Projects/Real World Application
ⓘ
- Presence of a project or practical application
- Complexity and scope of the project
Moderate

Skills: 18 /30

Faculties: Who are the experts behind the course?

Academic/Industry Exp.
ⓘ
- Educational background
- Work experience in relevant industries
Strong
Teaching Experience
ⓘ
- Experience teaching similar courses or topics
- Teaching style and approach (engaging, clear, accessible)
Strong
Industry Recognition
ⓘ
- Awards and recognition in the field
- Contributions to opensource projects, communities, or publications
Moderate

Faculties: 15 /20

Delivery Methods: How Is the program delivered?

Live Interaction
ⓘ
- Availability of live lectures, Q&A sessions, or webinars
- Provide direct interaction and realtime clarification of concepts
- Quality and effectiveness of live interactions
Very Limited
Self-Paced
ⓘ
- Flexibility in scheduling and pacing
- Prerecorded videos covering lectures, tutorials, demonstrations, and supplemental content, allowing students to engage with course material flexibly.
- Quality and availability of selfpaced materials (videos, readings, exercises)
Strong
Assessment
ⓘ
- Variety of assessment types (quizzes, assignments, projects)
- Alignment of assessments with learning objectives
- Quality and timeliness of feedback on assessments
Strong
Community
ⓘ
- Presence and activity of online forums, discussion boards, or other community spaces
- Level of engagement and support from instructors and moderators
Moderate
Collaborative
ⓘ
- Opportunities for group projects, peer review, or other collaborative activities
Limited

Delivery Methods: 17 /30

Career Assistance: How does the program support career growth?

Mentoring
ⓘ
- Availability of personalized guidance and support from mentors or career coaches
Very Limited
Personalized Assistance
ⓘ
- Availability of career Assessments (personality, skills, interests) to help learners understand their strengths and potential career paths
Limited
Alumni Network
ⓘ
- Active alumni network for networking
Very Limited
Industry Partnerships
ⓘ
- Partnerships with companies
Very Limited

Career Assistance: 4.199999999999999 /15

Student Satisfaction and Feedback: What Do Students Say About the Course?

Feedback & Improvement
ⓘ
- Quantity and quality of student reviews
- Responsiveness of course providers to feedback
- Evidence of continuous improvement in the course content and delivery
Strong

Alumini Feedback: 4 /5

Benchmark Labels:

Strong (75-100%): This indicates the course demonstrates exceptional strengths in this area, exceeding expectations.

Moderate (50-74%): This signifies the course performs adequately in this area, covering essential aspects.

Limited (25-49%): This highlights areas where the course could significantly improve to provide a more comprehensive learning experience.

Very Limited (1-24%): This indicates that coverage in this area may be minimal, or even non-existent.

Not Applicable: This indicates that this criteria is not applicable for this course.