The Ken’s Narrative Thinking for Leadership Transformation Program -Ivanooo

Ken

Instructor-led lectures (virtual or in-person)

What is The Course All About?

Pros:

Comprehensive and Engaging Content: The program covers a wide range of topics related to narrative thinking and storytelling in leadership.
Experienced and Knowledgeable Instructors: Led by experts in storytelling and leadership with real-world experience.
Interactive and Collaborative Learning: Emphasizes active participation, group discussions, and peer feedback.
Real-World Relevance: Case studies and examples showcase the practical application of storytelling in leadership.
Focus on Authentic Leadership: Helps leaders develop their own personal style and build trust with their teams.

Cons:

Limited Depth in Certain Areas: Could delve deeper into specific applications of storytelling for different leadership challenges.

Primary Focus: Skill Acquisition

Leaders in ambitious organizations who want to apply storytelling to achieve strategic goals.
Executives, managers, and team leaders seeking to enhance their communication and influence skills.
Professionals who want to develop a more authentic and impactful leadership style.

N/A

Advanced (for experienced learners)

Depth and Breadth of Topics
ⓘ
- Range of topics covered. - Number of topics, comprehensiveness (introductory to advanced)
- Theoretical vs. practical balance
- Alignment with industry standards and current trends
Strong
Case Studies
ⓘ
- Number and variety of case studies
- Relevance of case studies to the course topic and target audience
Strong
Tools
ⓘ
- Use of industrystandard tools and technologies
- Handson experience with tools
Moderate
Capstone Projects/Real World Application
ⓘ
- Presence of a project or practical application
- Complexity and scope of the project
Moderate

Skills: 24 /30

Academic/Industry Exp.
ⓘ
- Educational background
- Work experience in relevant industries
Strong
Teaching Experience
ⓘ
- Experience teaching similar courses or topics
- Teaching style and approach (engaging, clear, accessible)
Strong
Industry Recognition
ⓘ
- Awards and recognition in the field
- Contributions to opensource projects, communities, or publications
Strong

Faculties: 20 /20

Live Interaction
ⓘ
- Availability of live lectures, Q&A sessions, or webinars
- Provide direct interaction and realtime clarification of concepts
- Quality and effectiveness of live interactions
Strong
Self-Paced
ⓘ
- Flexibility in scheduling and pacing
- Prerecorded videos covering lectures, tutorials, demonstrations, and supplemental content, allowing students to engage with course material flexibly.
- Quality and availability of selfpaced materials (videos, readings, exercises)
Not Applicable
Assessment
ⓘ
- Variety of assessment types (quizzes, assignments, projects)
- Alignment of assessments with learning objectives
- Quality and timeliness of feedback on assessments
Limited
Community
ⓘ
- Presence and activity of online forums, discussion boards, or other community spaces
- Level of engagement and support from instructors and moderators
Moderate
Collaborative
ⓘ
- Opportunities for group projects, peer review, or other collaborative activities
Strong

Delivery Methods: 18 /30

Mentoring
ⓘ
- Availability of personalized guidance and support from mentors or career coaches
Limited
Personalized Assistance
ⓘ
- Availability of career Assessments (personality, skills, interests) to help learners understand their strengths and potential career paths
Limited
Alumni Network
ⓘ
- Active alumni network for networking
Not Applicable
Industry Partnerships
ⓘ
- Partnerships with companies
Not Applicable

Career Assistance: 4 /15

Alumini Feedback: 4 /5

Strong (75-100%): This indicates the course demonstrates exceptional strengths in this area, exceeding expectations.

Moderate (50-74%): This signifies the course performs adequately in this area, covering essential aspects.

Limited (25-49%): This highlights areas where the course could significantly improve to provide a more comprehensive learning experience.

Very Limited (1-24%): This indicates that coverage in this area may be minimal, or even non-existent.

Not Applicable: This indicates that this criteria is not applicable for this course.