Simplilearn Microsoft Certified Azure Data Engineer Associate DP 203 -Ivanooo

Accrediations

Aligned with Microsoft Certified: Azure Data Engineer Associate (DP-203)

Durartion of the Course

Approximately 4 weeks

Course Fee

$459

Mode of Learning

Instructor-led lectures (virtual or in-person)

What is The Course All About?

Pros:

Comprehensive coverage of Azure data engineering services
Hands-on labs and practical projects
Training by Microsoft-certified instructors
Access to official Microsoft learning resources

Cons:

Limited information on personalized career support
Lack of explicit details on community engagement platforms

Who is the Course Meant For?

Azure Developers
Cloud Solution Architects
Software Developers
Application Engineers
Technical Team Leads
Data Engineers
Data Architects
Individuals with knowledge of SQL, Python, or Scala, and familiarity with Microsoft Azure services and data architecture patterns.

Accreditations and Rankings

Aligned with Microsoft Certified: Azure Data Engineer Associate (DP-203)

Intermediate (for those with basic knowledge)

Skills: What does this program cover?

Depth and Breadth of Topics
ⓘ
- Range of topics covered. - Number of topics, comprehensiveness (introductory to advanced)
- Theoretical vs. practical balance
- Alignment with industry standards and current trends
Strong
Case Studies
ⓘ
- Number and variety of case studies
- Relevance of case studies to the course topic and target audience
Moderate
Tools
ⓘ
- Use of industrystandard tools and technologies
- Handson experience with tools
Strong
Capstone Projects/Real World Application
ⓘ
- Presence of a project or practical application
- Complexity and scope of the project
Moderate

Skills: 21 /30

Faculties: Who are the experts behind the course?

Academic/Industry Exp.
ⓘ
- Educational background
- Work experience in relevant industries
Strong
Teaching Experience
ⓘ
- Experience teaching similar courses or topics
- Teaching style and approach (engaging, clear, accessible)
Strong
Industry Recognition
ⓘ
- Awards and recognition in the field
- Contributions to opensource projects, communities, or publications
Strong

Faculties: 17 /20

Delivery Methods: How Is the program delivered?

Live Interaction
ⓘ
- Availability of live lectures, Q&A sessions, or webinars
- Provide direct interaction and realtime clarification of concepts
- Quality and effectiveness of live interactions
Strong
Self-Paced
ⓘ
- Flexibility in scheduling and pacing
- Prerecorded videos covering lectures, tutorials, demonstrations, and supplemental content, allowing students to engage with course material flexibly.
- Quality and availability of selfpaced materials (videos, readings, exercises)
Moderate
Assessment
ⓘ
- Variety of assessment types (quizzes, assignments, projects)
- Alignment of assessments with learning objectives
- Quality and timeliness of feedback on assessments
Moderate
Community
ⓘ
- Presence and activity of online forums, discussion boards, or other community spaces
- Level of engagement and support from instructors and moderators
Very Limited
Collaborative
ⓘ
- Opportunities for group projects, peer review, or other collaborative activities
Very Limited

Delivery Methods: 15 /30

Career Assistance: How does the program support career growth?

Mentoring
ⓘ
- Availability of personalized guidance and support from mentors or career coaches
Limited
Personalized Assistance
ⓘ
- Availability of career Assessments (personality, skills, interests) to help learners understand their strengths and potential career paths
Very Limited
Alumni Network
ⓘ
- Active alumni network for networking
Very Limited
Industry Partnerships
ⓘ
- Partnerships with companies
Strong

Career Assistance: 5 /15

Student Satisfaction and Feedback: What Do Students Say About the Course?

Feedback & Improvement
ⓘ
- Quantity and quality of student reviews
- Responsiveness of course providers to feedback
- Evidence of continuous improvement in the course content and delivery
Strong

Alumini Feedback: 4 /5

Benchmark Labels:

Strong (75-100%): This indicates the course demonstrates exceptional strengths in this area, exceeding expectations.

Moderate (50-74%): This signifies the course performs adequately in this area, covering essential aspects.

Limited (25-49%): This highlights areas where the course could significantly improve to provide a more comprehensive learning experience.

Very Limited (1-24%): This indicates that coverage in this area may be minimal, or even non-existent.

Not Applicable: This indicates that this criteria is not applicable for this course.