EC-Council Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) certification -Ivanooo

Accrediations

ANSI Accredited

Durartion of the Course

40 hours

Course Fee

$1,199 USD

Mode of Learning

Integrated Learning

What is The Course All About?

Pros:

Comprehensive coverage of ethical hacking topics.
Hands-on experience with industry-standard tools.
Flexible learning options to accommodate different schedules.

Cons:

The course fee may be high for some individuals.
Requires prior experience or training in information security.

Primary Focus: Skill Acquisition

Who is the Course Meant For?

Information security professionals seeking to enhance their ethical hacking skills.
Network administrators aiming to secure their organization’s infrastructure.
IT professionals interested in pursuing a career in cybersecurity.
Individuals preparing for roles such as penetration testers, security analysts, or consultants.
Individuals with at least 2 years of work experience in information security.

Accreditations and Rankings

ANSI Accredited

Advanced (for experienced learners)

Skills: What does this program cover?

Depth and Breadth of Topics
ⓘ
- Range of topics covered. - Number of topics, comprehensiveness (introductory to advanced)
- Theoretical vs. practical balance
- Alignment with industry standards and current trends
Strong
Case Studies
ⓘ
- Number and variety of case studies
- Relevance of case studies to the course topic and target audience
Moderate
Tools
ⓘ
- Use of industrystandard tools and technologies
- Handson experience with tools
Strong
Capstone Projects/Real World Application
ⓘ
- Presence of a project or practical application
- Complexity and scope of the project
Strong

Skills: 24 /30

Faculties: Who are the experts behind the course?

Academic/Industry Exp.
ⓘ
- Educational background
- Work experience in relevant industries
Moderate
Teaching Experience
ⓘ
- Experience teaching similar courses or topics
- Teaching style and approach (engaging, clear, accessible)
Moderate
Industry Recognition
ⓘ
- Awards and recognition in the field
- Contributions to opensource projects, communities, or publications
Strong

Faculties: 13 /20

Delivery Methods: How Is the program delivered?

Live Interaction
ⓘ
- Availability of live lectures, Q&A sessions, or webinars
- Provide direct interaction and realtime clarification of concepts
- Quality and effectiveness of live interactions
Strong
Self-Paced
ⓘ
- Flexibility in scheduling and pacing
- Prerecorded videos covering lectures, tutorials, demonstrations, and supplemental content, allowing students to engage with course material flexibly.
- Quality and availability of selfpaced materials (videos, readings, exercises)
Strong
Assessment
ⓘ
- Variety of assessment types (quizzes, assignments, projects)
- Alignment of assessments with learning objectives
- Quality and timeliness of feedback on assessments
Strong
Community
ⓘ
- Presence and activity of online forums, discussion boards, or other community spaces
- Level of engagement and support from instructors and moderators
Moderate
Collaborative
ⓘ
- Opportunities for group projects, peer review, or other collaborative activities
Moderate

Delivery Methods: 23 /30

Career Assistance: How does the program support career growth?

Mentoring
ⓘ
- Availability of personalized guidance and support from mentors or career coaches
Strong
Personalized Assistance
ⓘ
- Availability of career Assessments (personality, skills, interests) to help learners understand their strengths and potential career paths
Very Limited
Alumni Network
ⓘ
- Active alumni network for networking
Limited
Industry Partnerships
ⓘ
- Partnerships with companies
Moderate

Career Assistance: 8 /15

Student Satisfaction and Feedback: What Do Students Say About the Course?

Feedback & Improvement
ⓘ
- Quantity and quality of student reviews
- Responsiveness of course providers to feedback
- Evidence of continuous improvement in the course content and delivery
Strong

Alumini Feedback: 4 /5

Benchmark Labels:

Strong (75-100%): This indicates the course demonstrates exceptional strengths in this area, exceeding expectations.

Moderate (50-74%): This signifies the course performs adequately in this area, covering essential aspects.

Limited (25-49%): This highlights areas where the course could significantly improve to provide a more comprehensive learning experience.

Very Limited (1-24%): This indicates that coverage in this area may be minimal, or even non-existent.

Not Applicable: This indicates that this criteria is not applicable for this course.